Cursor & Claude Code vs Specsight
How Cursor & Claude Code and Specsight differ
- FOR ENGINEERS
Use Cursor and Claude Code to write and ship code faster
- Writing and refactoring code
- Explaining code, right in the editor
- Debugging with the codebase in context
- Automating changes across a codebase
- Quick answers for the person asking
- FOR PMS, SUPPORT & STAKEHOLDERS
Use Specsight to follow how your product behaves and changes
- How every feature behaves, in plain language
- What’s new in your product, after every release
- Product map and user flows
- Release notes ready to share with clients
- Answers without asking an engineer
Why they’re different
A coding assistant answers one person, one question, at one moment — and the answer lives and dies in that chat. Nothing is shared, nothing is saved, and two people asking the same thing get two different answers. Specsight reads the same code but builds one structured view the whole company works from — updated with every release, with the full history of how the product changed
How they fit together
Your engineers keep their coding assistants — that's where the speed comes from. Specsight is for everyone that speed leaves behind: product, support, and sales follow what shipped without opening an editor or interrupting anyone
Frequently asked questions
They can — one engineer, one question, one answer that disappears into a chat. Nobody else sees it, nothing is saved, and next release someone asks again. Specsight reads each release once for the whole company, keeps the answer, and builds the history
That's exactly the gap. Coding assistants live in the editor and speak engineer — most of the company will never open one. Specsight is built for those people: plain language, organised by feature, no code in sight
No, and nobody has to remember anything. Every release, Specsight re-reads what changed in the code and updates the picture itself. There is no separate document to fall behind — the view is read from the product, so it moves when the product moves